TL;DR
- I use interview prep like a system, not like random note review.
- The most valuable tracks for my background are JavaScript runtime depth, React internals, frontend system design, API trade-offs, and principal-level architecture reasoning.
- This page is the index that ties the deeper knowledge pages together into one repeatable study flow.
- For senior-to-principal interviews, consistency of explanation matters almost as much as raw technical depth.
Context
The resource folder had a strong prep set, but most of the value was buried across separate markdown files. I wanted the website to expose that same structure in a way that connects directly to the knowledge pages already in the app.
The Approach
I think about interview readiness in four tracks:
1. Runtime and language depth
- JavaScript Closures & Scope
- Async JavaScript: Promises, async/await, Generators
- JavaScript Event Loop & Runtime Model
- Browser APIs & Observers
2. React and rendering depth
3. System design and architecture depth
- Frontend System Design
- Frontend Patterns
- API Patterns
- Microservices Patterns
- Monorepo Architecture
- Micro-Frontend Architecture
- Module Federation at Scale
4. Interview execution
Trade-offs
- A prep index creates structure, but it can still become passive reading if I do not pair it with out-loud explanation and coding practice.
- Broad review feels productive, but focused repetition on weak areas usually moves interview performance faster.
- Principal-level prep especially needs trade-off fluency, not memorized wording.
References
- Related: Interview Q&A Bank
- Related: 14-Day Prep Plan
- Related: Principal Interview Prep